Prompt Engineering Techniques for Improved Model Interactions

Main Article Content

Shilesh Karunakaran
& Dr. Neeraj Saxena

Abstract

Prompt engineering has been one of the primary methodologies to improve the interaction of machine learning models, especially in natural language processing (NLP) systems. While recent advances in large language models have improved their flexibility in a broad variety of applications, the process of achieving best performance on multiple tasks and domains remains a challenge. The crux of this challenge lies in the creation and optimization of input prompts, which play a pivotal role in determining the quality and relevance of model responses. While there has been growing interest in prompt engineering, there is no large body of literature that extensively investigates the methodologies for better model interactions. This present study is an effort to bridge the gap by investigating the strategies for effective prompt generation and editing resulting in better model responses. This research investigates the effect of ordered and dynamic forms of prompts and seeks to maximize the accuracy, coherence, and contextual relevance of model responses. The research is meant to introduce new techniques of fine-tuning prompts through the use of domain expertise and model feedback loops, which could play a critical role in further developing the flexibility of such models across different applications in real-world situations. In addition, we discuss the potential for combining prompt engineering with other enabling methods, including reinforcement learning and few-shot learning, to enhance interactions that are more robust and scalable. Ultimately, this investigation is meant to advance the current state of language models by delivering concrete frameworks to researchers and engineers that can enhance the quality of interactions in machine learning and help develop more effective and explainable AI systems.

Article Details

How to Cite
Karunakaran, S., & Saxena, & D. N. (2025). Prompt Engineering Techniques for Improved Model Interactions. Journal of Quantum Science and Technology (JQST), 2(2), Apr(326–347). Retrieved from https://jqst.org/index.php/j/article/view/279
Section
Original Research Articles

References

• Garg, S., Tsipras, D., Liang, P., & Valiant, G. (2022). What can transformers learn in-context? A case study of simple function classes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35, 1-15.

• Greyling, C. (2024, September 30). A brief history of prompt: Leveraging language models through advanced prompting. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04438

• Hewing, M., & Leinhos, V. (2024, December 6). The prompt canvas: A literature-based practitioner guide for creating effective prompts in large language models. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05127

• Kumar, A., Sahoo, P., Saha, S., Jain, V., Mondal, S., & Chadha, A. (2024, February 5). A systematic survey of prompt engineering in large language models: Techniques and applications. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07927

• Leidinger, A., van Rooij, R., & Shutova, E. (2023). The language of prompting: What linguistic properties make a prompt successful? Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, 1-12. https://aclanthology.org/2023.findings-emnlp.1

• Narang, S., & Chowdhery, A. (2022, March 1). Self-consistency improves chain of thought reasoning in language models. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07393

• Saha, P., Singh, A. K., Saha, S., Jain, V., Mondal, S., & Chadha, A. (2024, February 5). A systematic survey of prompt engineering in large language models: Techniques and applications. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07927

• Sclar, M., Choi, Y., Tsvetkov, Y., & Suhr, A. (2024, July 1). Quantifying language models' sensitivity to spurious features in prompt design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formatting. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.01122

• Singh, A., Ehtesham, A., Gupta, G. K., Chatta, N. K., Kumar, S., & Talaei Khoei, T. (2024, October 9). Exploring prompt engineering: A systematic review with SWOT analysis. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12843

• Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., & Ichter, B. (2022, October 31). Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11903

• Zhang, Y., & Besta, M. (2024). Graph of thoughts: Solving elaborate problems with large language models. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 38(1), 1234-1241. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i1.12256