Product Management in Resource-Constrained Environments: Maximizing Impact in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Main Article Content

Maheswari Govindaraju
Prof. (Dr) MSR Prasad

Abstract

Product management is a critical function for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) operating in resource-constrained environments. This study explores the complex challenges and innovative strategies that SMEs employ to maximize product impact despite limited financial, human, and technological resources. Through a comprehensive mixed-methods approach combining in-depth case studies with broad-based surveys, the research examines the dynamic interplay between resource limitations and strategic product development. The findings reveal that SMEs often adopt agile product management frameworks that emphasize prioritization, flexibility, and continuous learning. Such frameworks enable these organizations to focus on core competencies and rapidly adapt to changing market conditions, thereby enhancing their competitive advantage.


The study demonstrates that successful SMEs implement cross-functional collaboration and customer-centric design principles to create and refine products that meet specific market needs. By leveraging lean methodologies and iterative processes, these enterprises can efficiently allocate resources, reduce waste, and accelerate time-to-market. Furthermore, digital transformation plays a pivotal role in enabling SMEs to overcome resource constraints. The integration of affordable and scalable digital tools facilitates data-driven decision making, real-time feedback collection, and streamlined communication among teams. These technological advancements contribute to more effective product lifecycle management, ensuring that innovation is sustained even in the face of resource shortages.


Another critical aspect uncovered by the research is the role of external partnerships and networks in supplementing internal capabilities. Strategic alliances with technology providers, industry experts, and academic institutions allow SMEs to access external knowledge, resources, and support. These collaborations not only enhance product development processes but also open avenues for co-creation and market expansion. The study also highlights the importance of adaptive leadership and strategic vision in navigating uncertainty. Leaders in SMEs who foster a culture of experimentation and risk-taking are better positioned to harness limited resources for creative problem-solving and long-term growth.


 

Article Details

How to Cite
Govindaraju, M., & Prasad, P. (Dr) M. (2025). Product Management in Resource-Constrained Environments: Maximizing Impact in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Journal of Quantum Science and Technology (JQST), 2(2), Apr(106–118). Retrieved from https://jqst.org/index.php/j/article/view/252
Section
Original Research Articles

References

• Alon, I., & Shenkar, O. (2016). Global business management: A strategic and institutional approach. Routledge.

• Anderson, E. T., & Narus, J. A. (2004). Business market management: Understanding, creating, and delivering value. Pearson Prentice Hall.

• Antonelli, C., & Dangelico, R. M. (2016). Resource-based view and the strategic management of SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(2), 522-538. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12191

• Binns, A. (2010). Making innovation work: How to manage it, measure it, and profit from it. Wiley.

• Birkinshaw, J. M., & Gibson, C. B. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47-55.

• Choi, S., & Hwang, Y. (2015). Success factors of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in global business. Small Business Economics, 44(4), 587-605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9605-5

• Cook, S. D., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381-400. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.4.381

• Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current research practice and implications for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102500407

• Day, G. S. (2011). The dynamic capability view of the firm: A critical review. Oxford University Press.

• de Lemos, R., & Laplante, P. (2012). Product management and software engineering in SMEs. Springer.

• Galbraith, J. R. (2014). Designing organizations: Strategy, structure, and processes. Wiley.

• Gans, J. S., & Scott, E. (2019). Product management for SMEs: Navigating resource constraints in innovation-driven organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 42(3), 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3121

• Hoskisson, R. E., Eden, L., Lau, C. M., & Wright, M. (2000). Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556399

• Kaplan, S. (2008). Strategy and structure in small firms: A resource-based perspective. Springer.

• McGrath, R. G. (2013). The end of competitive advantage: How to keep your strategy moving as fast as your business. Harvard Business Review Press.

• Porter, M. E. (1996). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

• Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32(3), 4-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570410699249

• Roper, S. (2014). Innovation and entrepreneurship in SMEs. Springer.

• Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, 38(4), 8-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852

• Zacharakis, A., & Shepherd, D. (2001). The nature of information and overconfidence on venture performance: A longitudinal study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225870102500101

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

<< < 18 19 20 21 22 23 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.